|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1526
|
Posted - 2013.12.20 10:54:00 -
[1] - Quote
Now that one of the d'Hanguest sisters has put her head above the metaphorical parapet, I have a question. It's quite a simple one, so I imagine there will be no problem in getting an answer.
What do you hope to gain by these acts of aggression?
I mean, you're not going to destroy us. You're not going to improve our view of you. You're not going to convert us to your opinions.
As far as I can see, the most that you'll achieve is to distract PIE from its work in the war with the Shakorite regime and sow division in the ranks of the 24th IC. Is that what you want? Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1526
|
Posted - 2013.12.20 11:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:Rodj Blake wrote:Now that one of the d'Hanguest sisters has put her head above the metaphorical parapet, I have a question. It's quite a simple one, so I imagine there will be no problem in getting an answer.
What do you hope to gain by these acts of aggression?
I mean, you're not going to destroy us. You're not going to improve our view of you. You're not going to convert us to your opinions.
As far as I can see, the most that you'll achieve is to distract PIE from its work in the war with the Shakorite regime and sow division in the ranks of the 24th IC. Is that what you want? Profound question, Rodj. Why donGÇÖt we have some cake with Samira Kernher and discuss it? [But a little hint for now: Not everything I do I do for a GÇ£gainGÇ¥, some things are justified and need to be done. Do you fight for a gain? Or because the Lord commanded you to fight?] Kind regards, Odelya Negin Intourtsetseg of House dGÇÖHanguest
Aah, as I thought, a complete refusal to answer.
Let me rephrase the question then, to make things easier for you: what do you hope to achieve by your acts of aggression? Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1527
|
Posted - 2013.12.20 13:04:00 -
[3] - Quote
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:Rodj Blake wrote:Aah, as I thought, a complete refusal to answer.
Let me rephrase the question then, to make things easier for you: what do you hope to achieve by your acts of aggression? Aah, as I thought, a complete refusal to real dialogue... Let me rephrase the answer then, to make things easier for you, and see if you are just looking for some cheap exploits or are really interested in a conversation: Why donGÇÖt we meet and discuss it? You might also bring the little dove, to make things look a bit less ossified. And another hint: If a nervous clique of fossilised reptiles and an inept leadership continues to offend you, do you just sit back and talk? Oh, wait... Yes, that is exactly what you would do... But tell me: If you canGÇÖt even take the challenge of fighting a war which is brought to your doorsteps, how can you even talk about bringing stability and order to the Empire and defeat to the Shakorites?
First of all we're being condemned for not talking, then we're being condemned for just sitting back and talking.
Do make up your mind!
They say that a house divided is a house that falls. But then you already know that. After all, it's the main reason why you've been trying to provoke a civil war in the 24th IC.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1534
|
Posted - 2013.12.21 15:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
Silas Vitalia wrote:Since this is all out in public, would one of the chief participants or antagonists mind clearly explaining what the Casus Belli for this was?
What is the conflict over? Spilled tea? Improper bowing and gesticulating to the proper degree and direction? Using a picture of Jamyl as a hankerchief?
Or are there actual philosophical differences at play? Or merely retribution for some insults?
Odelya d'Hanguest made some comments not befitting an Amarrian. I amongst others suggested that she was overstepping the bounds of decency. An argument ensued, during which words were exchanged. Since then I understand she's been trying to get her friends and colleagues to declare war on us, but without much luck.
So she's hired mercenaries instead, and has finally persuaded her sister to join the fray as well.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1534
|
Posted - 2013.12.22 08:39:00 -
[5] - Quote
Katrina Oniseki wrote:I don't know, Vitalia.
Stormcrows are doing their silent bloodwork rather well, rather than posting. It's showing a fairly one sided 125:0 war report right now.
Since you're keen to check the numbers, perhaps you could provide some context by comparing our losses to Stormcrows with the far greater value of both our victories against and losses to our primary focus: the Shakorites.
Also, how does the value of our losses compare to the expense of bankrolling this futile war against us?
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1614
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 23:14:00 -
[6] - Quote
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:While we are not going to waste our time responding to the nonsense PIE spreads here like a prostitute does herpes, we would like to clarify that our positions towards the treasonous GÇ£Theology CouncilGÇ¥ stand. The current substance of the Empire is one of rottenness, decay, usurpation, corruption and heresy. While this might serve as a matter of fruitful discussions, the schismatic Praetorians have insulted the Kingdom and us repeatedly and discountenanced every serious arbitration attempt, so that there is no difference anymore between the schismatics of PIE and the GÇ£Tribal Liberation Force.GÇ¥
Kind regards, Odelya Negin Intourtsetseg of House dGÇÖHanguest
As you may recall, after considering your initial proposal (the one to myself and a third party rather than the identical one you later sent to other senior PIE officers) I suggested that arbitration wasn't necessary because all that was needed was for both sides to shut up. But apparently you were more interested in creating drama and scoring points than in actually resolving anything.
I believe that my stance was supported by the aforementioned third party.
It's a shame that you didn't take me up on that initial offer, since as you've now moved on to shooting at us there's now no way I'll stop denouncing you (at the very least) at every opportunity. Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1617
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 12:39:00 -
[7] - Quote
Morijah d'Hanguest wrote: It is the pleasure of Her Grace to entertain a private mercenary force.
Movie screenings for the troops? Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1623
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 23:43:00 -
[8] - Quote
Lyn Farel wrote:Since when the Khanid area is included in that proxy war ?
Firstly Khanid holds a seat on the Privy Council, and is therefore involved in the prosecution of the war
Secondly where do you think the Shakorite regime occupying Pator will turn its attentions to next should the Empire fail? Do you think those Minmatar slaves in the Kingdom are somehow not in the plans of the Shakorites? Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1625
|
Posted - 2013.12.25 23:20:00 -
[9] - Quote
Morijah d'Hanguest wrote:
The inhabitants of Palas are devoted to Her Grace and their support is overwhelming. Also the reaction Her Grace has received from other Khanid holders and the lesser nobility is overwhelmingly positive.
Have you hired Vaari as a speechwriter? Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1643
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 12:41:00 -
[10] - Quote
I for one am glad to see this insanity end.
It's just a shame that it's come at the cost of so many crewmen's lives and the loss of d'Hanguest family honour. Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |
|
|
|
|